Tweeter button
Facebook button
Linkedin button
Delicious button

Skip to content


The Mick vs. The Say Hey Kid, Round 6,832

New York baseball exists in an eternal present of a sort. Although fans decreasingly find themselves sitting at the ol’–or more accurately new–ballpark with someone who can wax poetic about seeing Dimag (or Ruth or Gehrig) play, walk into any sports bar on a snowy Saturday in February and you’ll hear talk not only of Kelvim Escobar’s bum shoulder or the battle for the Yanks’ fifth starter slot,  but also, quite likely, an argument over who was better Gooden, Ojeda and Darling or Raschi, Reynolds and Lopat (hint: one of the trios had two 20 game winners, the other had none), or, that hearty perennial: Mantle vs. Mays?

I was thinking about the Say Hey kid today after reading in the NYT Book Review Pete Hamill’s frankly slight and perfunctory review of James Hirsh’s new Mays biography, and spending the week listening to the increasingly cranky and bullying Mike Francesca on WFAN continually dismiss any talk of Mays as a better offensive player than Mantle.

Now, I never saw either play, or rather I was a wee child of 6 when Mantle retired and 10 when Mays finally hung up his spikes so I have no meaningful memory of either.  That gives me some disadvantages in trying to gauge the relative merits of the two great NY centerfielders of the 1950s–I’m left to fly by instruments only–but it also gives me some significant advantages–my view of the two players is not fogged over by romantic nostalgia, and I’m unburdened with the presumptions about race that dogged perceptions of both players for fans in the 1950s and 1960s.

Some points then to consider: For Mays and Mantle their averge 162 games are nearly identical:

Mays: .302 BA, 36 HR, 103 RBI, 18 SB

Mantle: .298 BA, 36 HR, 102 RBI,  10 SB

Mantle won 3 MVPs, Mays 2 (plus a ROY). Each led his league in HRs four times, batting average once.  Each scored a ton of runs but Mantle, perhaps surprisingly drove in 100 runs or more only 4 times, Mays did it 10 times (including 8 season in a row in SF).  Neither, interestingly, ever had 200 hits, though Mays did lead the NL in hits once (with 190), Mantle never led the AL. And Mays, of course, was the much better outfielder (and struck out, on average, half as often as Mantle).

Mantle advocates point to his triple crown season, and argue that statistical comparisons are skewed somehow by the brevity of Mantle’s career and the length of Mays as if May’s greater durability and longevity were negative characteristics. But on the basis of the statistics I’d take Mays ahead of Mantle and I’m a Yankee fan.

Now, if you really want to know who was the best centerfielder in New York, dig this average 162 game season:

.325 BA, 34 HR, 143 RBI, 3 SB, 207 Hits….

Related Posts

Posted in Giants, Yankees. Tagged with , , , .

  • Tom K
    The general consensus on this is right I think: Mays had the better career, Mantle was better at his 3-5 year peak.

    The difference in 100+ RBI seasons requires at least 2 points of context: (i) mostly, Mays hit 4th & Mantle 3d; & (ii) Mantle walked a whole lot more.

    That second point brings us to the greatest difference-maker. Mantle's OBP is far better than Mays'. Against that, Mays was a far better defensive player (while, contary to prevailing assumptions, it seems Mantle had discernably better speed.)

  • tomwatson
    It did make Mantle's stratomatic cards better for those three great years - but I'm not sure wouldn't go with Mays in a head to head draft of 19-year-olds....
  • JasonChervokas
    Yeah, DiMaggio, astounding numbers for career averages, and he averaged the same number of Ks--34--and HR per 162. (Of course he didn't play 162). And he missed three prime years for military service. As a point of comparison, Pujol's current 162 game averages are DiMaggio like--maybe a little better, I mean more Ks, fewer RBIs but more HRs and a higher BA.
  • tomwatson
    The amazing thing about Dimag was the rarity of strikeouts to go along with his power - he really was the natural.
  • tomwatson
    That would be DiMaggio, of course....shorter, sweeter career and one of the best ever.

    Mantle v. Mays is fascinating because they were such exact contemporaries, starting for NY teams at the same time. Mays has the clear edge and it's pretty obvious though not overwhelming. I did see him play quite a bit, mainly on TV as an older player who still killed the Mets (and then, of course, as a broken-down over-40 extra).
blog comments powered by Disqus

(c) Copyright 2010 A Train Sports, Inc.